Trader Joe’s Recalls 10 Million More Pounds of Frozen Food in 43 States

Trader Joe’s Recalls 10 Million More Pounds of Frozen Food in 43 States

Claremont Colonic Trader Joes Recall

Fried rice, ramen and dumpling products sold nationwide have been recalled from the popular grocer.

Trader Joe’s is expanding its ongoing recall of multiple frozen food products that are sold in its stores.

In February, food supplier Ajinomoto Foods North America Inc. first recalled over three million pounds of frozen, not ready-to-eat chicken fried rice products, per the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS).

The recall was expanded on March 3 to include more than 33 million additional pounds of “various ready-to-eat and not ready-to-eat chicken and pork fried rice, ramen, and shu mai dumpling products,” per the FSIS.

As of March 20, the food supplier has expanded the recall once again to include nearly 10 million additional pounds of food.

Below, we’re sharing everything you need to know about the ongoing recall.

What Has Been Recalled?

February 19 Recall


On Feb. 19, 2026, Ajinomoto Foods North America Inc. recalled approximately 3,370,530 pounds of the following frozen food products sold at Trader Joe’s:

Ajinomuoto Yakitori Chicken with Japanese-Style Fried Rice:
  • 1.53-kilogram cardboard packages containing six bags
  • Best before date of Sept. 9, 2026 through Nov. 12, 2026


Trader Joe’s Chicken Fried Rice with Stir Fried Rice, Vegetables, Seasoned Dark Chicken Meat and Eggs:
  • 20-ounce plastic bag packages
  • Best by dates of Sept. 8, 2026 through Nov. 17, 2026

All of the recalled products were produced between Sep. 8, 2025 and Nov. 17, 2025. They all feature the establishment number P-18356 inside the USDA mark of inspection.

The Trader Joe’s item was shipped to Trader Joe’s stores nationwide, while the Ajinomoto product was only exported to Canada.

March 3 Recall

On March 3, 2026, Trader Joe’s posted a notice to its website related to Ajinomoto’s ongoing recall. In its message, the retailer announced that it was recalling certain Trader’s Joe frozen products “in an abundance of caution.”

The recall was expanded to include the following products:

  • Chicken Fried Rice: Best by dates between March 4, 2026 — Feb. 10, 2027
  • Vegetable Fried Rice: Best by dates between Feb. 28, 2026 — 0 Nov. 19, 2026
  • Japanese Style Fried Rice: Best by dates between Feb. 28, 2026 — Nov. 14, 2026
  • Chicken Shu Mai: Best by dates between March 13, 2026 — 03/ Oct. 23, 2026


March 20 Recall

On March 20, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) posted a notice to is website to share an update on the ongoing recall.

The FDA shared that Ajinomoto had added 9,885,240 pounds of frozen food products, including the following:

Trader Joe’s Vegetable Fried Rice

  • Item #5650233
  • Each case of 24 includes 1-pound bags
  • UPC #00521482
  • Case UPC # 10052148200001
  • Best by date ranges listed here


Per the FDA, the products were distributed to the following states: Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Why Are the Products Being Recalled?

All of the affected products have been recalled due to concerns that they may be contaminated with glass.

Per the FSIS, the issue was initially discovered after four consumers reported finding glass in the products. So far, there are no confirmed reports of injury.

What to Do If You Have the Recalled Products at Home

Consumers who have any of the affected products at home are encouraged to throw them away or return them to Trader Joe’s for a refund.


Contibutor: Chrissy Callahan – Today.com

Weight-Loss Treatment is on the Verge of a Dramatic Shift – Again

Weight-Loss Treatment is on the Verge of a Dramatic Shift - Again

Claremont Colonic Center
At the end of a seemingly ubiquitous commercial for telehealth company Ro, a characteristically flabbergasted Charles Barkley speaks for us all when he remarks, “Wait, you’re telling me they have a GLP-1 pill for weight loss now?”
They do – and it turns out to be as wildly popular as its injectable predecessors. Just about 10 weeks after it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the Wegovy pill is now estimated to be part of the daily regimen of about 400,000 Americans. And the field of weight-loss treatment is on the verge of even more head-spinning change.

A second pill is under review at the FDA, expected to hit the market as soon as next month, and many more are in clinical trials. Some companies are testing drugs that only need to be taken once a month. And an even more powerful next generation of medicines is quickly approaching, churning out trial results – including some new ones Thursday – that leave current options in the dust in terms of efficacy.

“We are entering this kind of phase two of using the GLP-1 system,” said Dr. Jody Dushay, an endocrinologist at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School.

The next wave could be driven by cost and convenience as much as by new approaches to treatment. The weight-loss pills – the one already on the market and the one waiting to be approved – have brought prices to new lows for US patients in a deal that both drugs’ makers struck with the Trump administration, even as insurance coverage can remain spotty for many.

And the more powerful drugs on the horizon could bring options for people who don’t get enough benefit from currently available therapies – but also, doctors warned, the risk of inappropriate use.

‘Triple G’

One such drug is retatrutide, a weekly injectable medicine in development at Eli Lilly, which also makes Mounjaro for diabetes and Zepbound for weight loss.

Those drugs are based on the active ingredient tirzepatide, which mimics two hormones: GLP-1 and GIP. Retatrutide ups the ante by adding a third, called glucagon, earning it the moniker “Triple G.”

It’s breaking records for weight loss induced with medicines; in clinical trial results reported in December, retatrutide led to average loss of up to 29% of participants’ body weight after 68 weeks, or about 71 pounds, in a study of people with knee osteoarthritis. The drug was also associated with reduced knee pain.

In new results released Thursday on type 2 diabetes, with which patients tend to lose less weight with medications, Lilly said the drug lowered A1C blood sugar levels by an average of 1.7% to 2% at 40 weeks and produced average weight loss of up to 17%, or about 37 pounds. That exceeds results for Mounjaro, which showed an average A1C reduction of 1.7% and weight loss of about 9% at the highest dose in a separate trial.

“It’s looking like perhaps we are approaching another level” with drugs like retatrutide, said Dr. Judith Korner, an endocrinologist and director of the Metabolic and Weight Control Center at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons.

Novo Nordisk, which competes with Lilly with its drugs Ozempic and Wegovy, is in the Triple G game as well, reporting average weight loss of almost 20% after 24 weeks in a mid-stage study of another experimental drug in China last month.

The company’s higher-dose version of Wegovy won FDA approval Thursday, based on trial results showing average weight loss of 21% over 72 weeks, putting it in the same league as Lilly’s Zepbound. Novo Nordisk said the weekly injectable drug would be available as a single-dose pen in the US in April, and hasn’t yet announced its price.

The company is also pursuing other approaches, including a drug called CagriSema that combines semaglutide – the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy – with cagrilintide, which targets another hormone called amylin. But in clinical trials, it hasn’t kept up with Lilly’s tirzepatide, much less retatrutide, although Novo Nordisk is testing higher doses.

Still, while the new combinations “would be great for people who need to lose more weight,” Korner said, “not everyone needs the so-called big gun.”

Drugs like retatrutide may be most appropriate for someone who has a body mass index above 45 – above 30 is considered obese – and for whom existing drugs haven’t worked sufficiently, Dushay said.

She estimates that about 10% of her patients either don’t get enough benefit from current medicines or can’t tolerate the side effects, which typically are gastrointestinal in nature, including nausea and vomiting.

Retatrutide has shown similar side effects, as well as a prickling sensation known as dysesthesia. And some participants have dropped out of retatrutide trials because they felt that they lost too much weight.

“There are these cases where retatrutide will be able to really make a difference,” Dushay said. But she worries that its souped-up results could be dangerous if it’s used inappropriately.

“What’s going to happen if people take it for just a little bit of weight loss?” she asked. Already, “you’re starting to see some Hollywood images of body types that are so shocking. So there is a little bit of concern about that.” It’s a concern that has been pervasive enough for existing drugs that Lilly released a commercial ahead of the 2024 Oscars urging against “vanity” use.

That was at a time when the drugs’ supply was a problem. “It matters who gets them,” the ad’s tagline said.

Now, supply is ramped up, including for pill versions of GLP-1s that are also changing the treatment landscape.

Two new weight-loss pills

The Wegovy pill was approved in December, and the speed with which people started using it broke records, according to one Wall Street firm, which said it became the fastest drug launch in history. Some analyses of early uptake show that it’s enticing at least some users who haven’t tried GLP-1 therapies before, suggesting that some may have preferred a noninjectable option. Many of the new prescriptions have been written by general practitioners, rather than weight-loss specialists.

But the Wegovy pill isn’t expected to be alone on the market for long. Eli Lilly – continuing a nearly century-long duel with Novo Nordisk that began with insulin and is escalating with GLP-1s – anticipates FDA approval of its own pill, called orforglipron, before the end of June.

A key differentiator is that it can be taken at any time of day, with or without food and drink, whereas the Wegovy pill has more restrictions. Since the latter is a version of semaglutide, which is typically given by injection, it’s been specially formulated to be taken orally. Thus it’s finickier than a typical pill: It must be taken first thing in the morning, with just a small amount of water, and no food, drinks or other medicines for at least 30 minutes.

For that reason, Korner said, orforglipron will be her go-to choice for people who decide they want to take a GLP-1 pill. “If you don’t take the Wegovy pill just right, very little of the drug is actually absorbed,” Korner said. “So it’s better to be able to remove that from the equation and not have to worry, ‘is my patient taking the pill correctly?’”

Changes in affordability

Cost is an important consideration as well, and there too, the weight-loss drug space has seen rapid transformation. The pills are priced at $149 a month for the lowest doses if patients pay out of pocket, through a deal struck with the Trump administration in November through its TrumpRx drug pricing initiative.

The companies also offer direct-pay prices for the injectable drugs, but they still cost hundreds of dollars a month out of pocket. Still, those prices can be the best for people whose insurance won’t cover the medicines, which can still be a major problem, Dushay said.

This year, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts announced that it would stop covering GLP-1s for obesity, saying the drugs’ costs were driving insurance premiums too high. It suggested that patients consider buying the drugs directly from manufacturers.

Medicare is a brighter spot, expanding coverage for some patients as part of the November deal, but still doesn’t cover weight-loss drugs for all who might want them.

Trouble with insurance coverage is a key reason Dushay said she’s seen patients switch to the Wegovy pill. And although orforglipron is expected to get the same starting price, if there’s a differential, Korner said, that could be a deciding factor for her.

“If they’re paying out of pocket and one is less expensive than the other and I think that they both are probably as good,” she said, “then I would switch.”


Contributor: Meg Tirrell – CNN Health

U.S. Pregnancy-Related Deaths Continue to Rise

U.S. Pregnancy-Related Deaths Continue to Rise

ClaremontColonicCenter
Study researcher says nation, which leads high-income peers in maternal mortality, needs better prenatal, extended postpartum care.
In the U.S., more than 80 percent of pregnancy-related deaths are preventable. Yet for many years, the nation has had the highest maternal mortality rate among high-income countries. And that rate continued to rise between 2018 and 2022, with large disparities by state, race, and ethnicity, a new study reports.

A team of researchers at the National Institutes of Health, in collaboration with Associate Professor Rose Molina of Harvard Medical School, used data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to study pregnancy-related deaths in that four-year period.

The sharpest rate increase occurred in 2021, likely reflecting the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. While the rates then lowered, they were still higher in 2022 (32.6 deaths per 100,00 live births) than they were in 2018 (25.3 deaths per 100,000 live births).

The results were consistent with past research that has demonstrated significant disparities across racial groups. American Indian and Alaska Native women had the highest mortality rate (106.3 deaths per 100,000 live births), nearly four times higher than the rate among white women (27.6 deaths per 100,000 live births), followed by non-Hispanic Black women (76.9 deaths per 100,00 live births).

State rates also varied greatly, ranging from 18.5 to 59.7 deaths per 100,000 live births.

In this edited conversation, Molina, an obstetrician-gynecologist, discusses the findings and what needs to happen next.

Why is pregnancy-related death much higher in the U.S. than other high-income countries?

“There are many reasons: our patchwork healthcare system, inequitable policies, maternity care deserts, as well as persistent systems of bias and discrimination across racial and ethnic groups.”


There are many reasons: our patchwork healthcare system, inequitable policies, maternity care deserts, as well as persistent systems of bias and discrimination across racial and ethnic groups. It’s the way in which the healthcare system is designed. There are also signals that reproductive-age individuals are experiencing more chronic medical conditions, including cardiovascular disease, at younger ages than before.

The results showed some significant racial disparities in maternal mortality rates. Was that surprising?

While I am saddened that the racial inequities have persisted, the reality is that this has been demonstrated over and over again in the literature. There have been some innovations aimed at reducing inequities between racial groups in health systems. But at a population level, as a country, we’re not seeing meaningful improvement yet.

Our study points to different policy levers that need to be addressed, because there shouldn’t be as much state-level variation as there is. One of our biggest findings is that we could have avoided 2,679 pregnancy-related deaths during this time period if the national rate were that of California. If California can do it, then how can we get other states to perform as well?

The overall leading cause of death in your study was cardiovascular disease, which accounted for just over 20 percent of deaths. Has that always been the case?

Over the decades in the U.S., we’ve seen a transition from hemorrhage to cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of pregnancy-related death. Cardiovascular disease encompasses a range of disorders: hypertension, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, and peripartum cardiomyopathy, cardiac arrest, and stroke.

One reason for the shift may be that more and more people have chronic hypertension. We saw that the highest increased rate of pregnancy-related death was actually in the middle-age group (those 25 to 39), not the highest-age group. Therefore, one of the potential concerns is that chronic diseases like hypertension are affecting younger people. It’s been much more common to have hypertension if you’re 40 or older. But we’re beginning to see more hypertension at an earlier age.

“We saw that the highest increased rate of pregnancy-related death was actually in the middle-age group (those 25 to 39), not the highest-age group. Therefore, one of the potential concerns is that chronic diseases like hypertension are affecting younger people.”

In fact, pregnancy-related death increased for all age groups between 2018 and 2022. How significant is that rise?


It’s only four years, and the studied time period spanned the initial part of the COVID pandemic. But there’s still enough evidence that we should be paying more attention to this increase. Even in 2022, the rates were higher than in 2018. And the rates were already rising in 2019, before the pandemic started.

You also found that “late maternal deaths” — those that occur between 42 days and 1 year after pregnancy — accounted for nearly a third of the total. Yet the World Health Organization does not include late maternal death in its definition of pregnancy-related mortality. Why is it important to consider this time period?

Internationally, any death during pregnancy and up to 42 days after birth is considered a maternal mortality. In the U.S., we’re moving toward being inclusive of the full year after birth, because the 42 days postpartum is somewhat arbitrary.

There’s a growing recognition that the postpartum period doesn’t just end on a cliff at six weeks, even though that’s how many of our healthcare systems are designed, but rather postpartum recovery should be treated as a continuum. The high number of late maternal deaths points to why we need to design better systems of healthcare in those later months, as opposed to only focusing on the first six to 12 weeks.

This study offers a fuller picture of the problem than past tallies. Can you talk a bit about that?

One of the biggest challenges in tracking maternal deaths in the United States is that we didn’t actually have a national system for tracking these deaths consistently until 2018, because that’s when the full implementation of the pregnancy checkbox on death certificates went into full effect across the 50 states.

What that means is that when someone dies, the death certificate now has a pregnancy check box, so there can be some indication as to whether the person who passed away was pregnant at the time. However, it took a long time for all states to fully implement that. That’s why our data is so interesting, because we looked at the data starting in 2018, when that process was fully implemented across the 50 states.

“The biggest take-home message is that we need to continue to invest in public health infrastructure. It’s very clear that we’re not getting better, and if anything, the rates of pregnancy-related deaths are getting worse.”

Now that everything is laid out, how can these numbers be improved? What needs to happen next?


The biggest take-home message is that we need to continue to invest in public health infrastructure. It’s very clear that we’re not getting better, and if anything, the rates of pregnancy-related deaths are getting worse. So we need to change something about how we are addressing this.

In particular, we need to increase investment in innovative solutions to address quality of care during pregnancy and the extended postpartum period. At the state level, we really need to be addressing policy differences and trying to understand why certain states fare so much worse than other states.

It’s a concerning moment because the public health infrastructure to track these deaths is at risk. Research dollars are being cut dramatically. Pregnancy is being deprioritized. These actions and cuts threaten any work trying to improve maternal health outcomes, which can help inform policy at the state level and advocacy to enhance access to quality full-spectrum pregnancy care.


Contributor: Anna Gibbs, Harvard Correspondent – The Harvard Gazette

Farmers in California Are Using Fracking Wastewater to Grow Your Food

Farmers in California Are Using Fracking Wastewater to Grow Your Food

Claremont Colonic Center
The old saying “Desperate times call for desperate measures” has never been more fitting than it is for California farmers. Faced with ongoing drought conditions and high water prices, these farmers have turned to a water source that is both questionable and alarming.
Your food is growing with the help of oil production wastewater

After three years of drought, the cost of purchasing fresh water in California’s Central Valley can be as much as 10 times the normal price. To fight the cost of water, farmers have turned to an alternative source of water — recycled wastewater from oil production. The difference in cost can be staggering. Farmers pay around 33 dollars per acre-foot for recycled wastewater compared to 1,500 dollars per acre-foot for freshwater.

In this area of California, agriculture and oil industries are basically side-by-side. You can look and see farming taking place right next to fields filled with oil wells. In total, 45 percent of the state’s farming business and 85 percent of its oil production takes place in Kern County.

High temperatures lead to drought conditions

The temperatures in this region can get quite high, often upwards of 104°F. Therefore, it is not surprising that water ends up in short supply. In the past, farmers could pump water from rivers to irrigate their crops. That is no longer an option because the water levels have become dangerously low.

The impact of the drought doesn’t stop there. Over 1,000 wells in the area have dried up as the water table is no longer meeting the needs.

500,000 barrels of recycled wastewater sold each day

When crude oil comes up out of the ground it is combined with water. It must be separated and this is how the wastewater comes about. “It’s hard for the oil industry to get rid of, so it’s a win-win for the oil companies,” said Abby Auffant, spokeswoman for oil giant Chevron when talking about selling wastewater to farmers.

The Cawelo Water District, a cooperative financed by local farmers, obtains 50 percent of its water supplies from the Chevron oil company. Presently, the Kern River operation of Chevron provides the Cawelo Water District with up to 500,000 barrels of recycled wastewater each day.

Making use of the recycled wastewater

The water is filtered and collected before being combined with water from other oil plants nearby. The water is then mixed with a supply of fresh water before it is given to local farmers.

“We’re in compliance with all the testing requirements,” said Auffant when referring to the third party testing that is done on the water. “There’s a petrochemical content in our… permit and we have always met and been under it.”

Not everyone agrees, and some environmental campaigners are outspoken with their concerns.

It’s an experiment that the state of California and the oil industry performs without consumer consent,” said Madeline Stano of the Center on Race, Poverty and the Environment. “In Chevron’s own report we found benzine and acetone, which are carcinogens,” referring to water that was sold to local farmers.

Scott Smith who is involved with the Water Defense lobby group that was started by actor Mark Ruffalo, called the testing methods “outdated.” “Chevron should be interested in partnering with more than just their complicit customer (Cawelo Water District) to protect health, community, environment and water resources,” said Smith.

No matter what reassurances the oil companies give, it’s hard to feel secure about eating food that was grown with recycled wastewater. There has never been a better time to grow your own food. If you don’t have a garden already, think about getting one started — even small spaces can produce a lot of food.


Contributor: The Alternative Daily