Bottom-Feeders: To Eat or Not To Eat?

Bottom-Feeders: To Eat or Not To Eat?

Claremont Colonic Center
Bottom-feeders. You’ve been taught to revile the name. Its mention has you curling your lip and culturing a look of disgust. These two words have been ingrained within your conscience to conjure up unpalatable visions. Things crawling among the filth of the lake or ocean floor, soaking up the collective waste of the water bodies they eek their pitiful existence in.
It seems reasonable to assume that you’d be far better off going for those aquatic creatures which live above — closer to the light. It stands to reason that such animals would be happier and healthier in the cleaner, clearer parts of the lake, river or ocean. The health of those animals would then pass into you when you eat them. Simple as that.

Plus, let’s face it, that subconscious aversion to things which we perceive as dirty is very much at play. The way you see it, an animal which spends its life on the lake floor or seafloor must be dirtier than the clean, crisp salmon cruising above.

But as with many misconceptions instilled into us by modern society, those poor bottom-feeders might deserve far more credit than you give them. Many of the water-based animals which you now consider to be healthy are in fact bottom-feeders, though it’s likely that you’ve not yet made that connection. Animals like sardines, anchovies, mackerel, squid, octopus, shrimp and shellfish are all classified as bottom-feeders. And they’re amongst the most healthy foods on the planet, both in the water and out.

Let’s get to the bottom of things (surprisingly, pun unintended) and sort out fact from fiction. Should you be eating bottom-feeders, or avoiding them like the dirty scavengers we think them to be?

What are bottom-feeders?

A bottom-feeder is any aquatic animal which spends some or all of its life feeding on or near the bottom of a water body. This could be a lake, river, ocean or even a teeny tiny pond in your backyard!

Common bottom-feeding animals include crabs, lobster and crayfish, shrimp, shellfish, sea anemones, snails, starfish and sea cucumbers. Some of these you’d eat, some you’d consider a delicacy and pay a small fortune to eat, and some you wouldn’t touch with a ten-foot pole!

In the fish world, bottom-feeders include:

  • Halibut
  • Flounder
  • Plaice
  • Sole
  • Eel
  • Cod
  • Haddock
  • Bass
  • Grouper
  • Carp
  • Snapper
  • Sardines
  • Catfish
  • And Shark
Probably a larger group than you expected, right? So, after the startling revelation that you’ve been eating bottom-feeders all your life, let’s get into the nitty gritty. Here’s a rundown of which bottom-feeding species provide a net benefit for your health, and which you should probably avoid.

Shellfish

The shellfish family is probably quite a bit broader in scope than you suspect. Yes, it includes all the regulars like mussels, oysters, scallops and clams. But it also includes animals like shrimp, lobster and crayfish… crazy, right?

As a general rule of thumb, shellfish are amazingly good for your health. The fact that they spend their lives immersed in mineral-rich waters means they’re fantastically nutrient dense. In many cases, shellfish provide vitamins and minerals which you’d be hard-pressed to find in any land-based animal or plant. And because you generally eat the whole animal (not a particular section like with beef or chicken), you’re getting the full spectrum of nutritional goodness from your mussel or oyster.

Clearly, shellfish bust the “bottom-feeder, no thanks!” mentality right out of the water. But let’s get down to specifics for a minute.

Oysters

Perhaps the heaviest hitter of the shellfish family, oysters truly are a superfood. Unlike many other overpriced “delicacy” foods, oysters are well worth the extra bucks you fork out at the restaurant. They’re the most nutrient dense of the shellfish. They are a great source of zinc, B-vitamins, vitamin A, vitamin E, copper and selenium.

As if that wasn’t enough, oysters provide an almost unparalleled concentration of anti-inflammatory omega-3 fatty acids. They also come loaded with protein and healthy fats.

Clams

Not too far behind the fabled oyster is the humble clam. Aside from the fact that (in my opinion) they taste considerably better than the snot-like oyster, they’re also a nutritional powerhouse. Clams have plenty of vitamin A, vitamin B12, selenium, magnesium, iron and omega-3s. They’re also super protein-rich, so there’s really no reason why you wouldn’t eat them!

Mussels

Like oysters and clams, mussels punch well above their weight. Not only are they amazingly rich and delicious in a nice white wine or garlic sauce, they also have plenty of nutrients and antioxidants. These include folate, thiamine, riboflavin, magnesium, iron, manganese, selenium and zinc. Many of these are really difficult to obtain from other food sources, making them an important go-to within your weekly diet.

Scallops

Few people can deny the taste sensation that is the scallop… especially if it’s wrapped in bacon! With something that tastes so good, you’ll be pleased to hear that scallops are an excellent nutritional choice. They contain loads of vitamin B12, magnesium, selenium, and zinc. Throw in plenty of protein and omega-3 fatty acids, and you’ve got a winner.

Crab, lobster and crayfish

When you think about it, lobster, crab and crayfish are kind of like the pigs of the sea. They’re skilled foragers and will eat almost anything they come across… including other dead animals. Does this make them bad to eat? No! With pigs, if they’re allowed to roam and forage for the foods they want, their meat is amazingly nutritious. So too with these members of the phylum Arthropoda, which are always wild caught (aside from some crayfish, but these farmed varieties are generally okay to eat as well).

Provided you source your lobster, crayfish or crab from healthy waters (that generally counts out any varieties caught in Asian waters), you’re doing your health a favor. These guys all provide plenty of magnesium, selenium and zinc, plus good levels of omega-3s and plenty of easily-digestible protein. Don’t be shy about dousing your lobster in a dollop of good grass-fed butter, either!

Shrimp

While shrimp doesn’t really compare to other shellfish in terms of its nutritional properties, it’s still a good source of protein. It also has decent levels of selenium and calcium, and is a good source of iodine and B vitamins. Certainly, you could do worse than to eat shrimp, but you need to make sure you source good quality varieties. This includes wild-caught shrimp from the cold, clear waters of the Pacific Northwest, and American farmed shrimp, which is raised surprisingly well. Look for packaging which promises sustainable harvesting.

Fish

Sardines, mackerel and anchovies

You’ve probably heard by now that cold-water, oily fish are good for you. This is doubly true for bottom-feeding fish like sardines, mackerel and anchovies. That’s because their small size means they’re less capable of bioaccumulating heavy metals like mercury. You’re much more likely to get heavy metal poisoning from large predatory fish like tuna or salmon than these little critters.

Aside from the fact that these fish are amongst the most sustainable species to eat, they’re also ridiculously nutritious. They contain very high concentrations of heart-healthy omega-3s, plenty of protein, lots of calcium, and plenty of other important vitamins and minerals. Once again, they run circles around the “bottom-feeder is bad” theory.

Cod and haddock

Cod and pollock are similar in that they are both lean, white, firm, wild-caught fish. Because they’re almost always wild-caught, their meat is generally clean and relatively contaminant free. On the other hand, because they’re lean fish, they’re relatively devoid of the nutrients found in fattier fish, such as those listed above. They are, however, a good clean source of protein and they do have reasonable levels of selenium and B-vitamins. And cod liver, as it happens, abounds with nutrition! As far as occasional meals go, they’re a good choice.

Keep in mind, however, that cod has a particularly nasty history of being overfished. For that reason, only choose cod which is guaranteed to have been caught sustainably.

Flounder and sole

Unfortunately, while tasty, these two species of bottom-feeding fish aren’t recommended. Due to their highly unsustainable fishing track record and the fact that the common Atlantic varieties tend to be contaminated with heavy metals, they should be avoided if possible.

Eel

The American eel, otherwise known as yellow eel or silver eel, is also generally one to avoid. American eel is often found in sushi in the U.S. and is generally very high in PCBs and mercury. Add to that the fact that American eel fisheries are poorly managed, and you’ve got a good reason to avoid these slippery characters.


Contributor: Liivi Hess – Alternative Daily

Wellness Trends Worth Taking into the New Year (and some that aren’t”)

Wellness Trends Worth Taking into the New Year (and some that aren't)

ClaremontColonicCenter
Trying to keep up with the flood of wellness trends last year was bewildering. Influencers promoted seemingly endless products and experiences under the banner of “wellness.” Some trends, like celery juicing, cold plunges and protein bars have been around for a few years now. But other trends that came across our radar in 2025 had more of an “old is new again” energy, like embracing full-fat dairy and cooking with beef tallow.
At NPR’s science desk, we did our best to pick apart what’s healthy and what’s hype. Here are seven of the trends NPR reported on, and what the data and experts had to say about them.

Trend: A return to full-fat dairy

For decades, public health messaging warned against high-fat dairy. But the argument against it is largely “circumstantial,” says Benoit LaMarche, a Canadian food scientist who headed up an evidence review of the relationship between dairy and heart disease risk, published in May.

The review concluded that generally speaking, fat-free, low-fat and full-fat dairy products had the same effects. Some studies have even shown the benefits of higher-fat over lower-fat dairy. For instance, one study that followed 18 adults for three weeks found drinking whole milk actually outperformed skim milk when it comes to raising HDL, or “good” cholesterol.

Moreover, experts are saying that worrying about the fat content in dairy is essentially a distraction from bigger dietary concerns like eating foods with too much salt, refined carbs and sugar.

The topic’s on the radar since Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised to end the “attack on whole milk, cheese and yogurt.” It’s also increasingly popular online among those participating in the TikTok-driven “cottage cheese comeback.”

Bottom line: Not the worst idea.

Trend: Wearing a weighted vest while taking your daily walk


Is striding around in an uncomfortably heavy vest a great workout that marries strengthening, weight loss, and cardio with fresh air and sunshine — or are wearers merely projecting a fitness-y image to their neighbors?

Weighted vests are often marketed to women in their 40s, looking to increase muscle and bone growth to mitigate the effects of decreasing estrogen. But the evidence that wearing them works for that is particularly scant.

One small study compared people walking with weighted vests with those who walked without them and found no significant difference in bone health. Another study did find some benefits for people who wore weighted vests while engaging in resistance workouts, but the study doesn’t make clear whether the vests or the exercises were the cause of healthy bone growth.

If you want a science-backed way to build muscle or replace bone density lost during perimenopause and menopause, experts like exercise scientist Lauren Colenso-Semple recommend resistance training.

Weighted vests may have some benefits for cardiovascular health, says Roger Fielding, who studies exercise science at Tufts University. Plus walking the same distance with more weight will burn more calories. (Just don’t expect us to do choreo, ok?!)

Bottom line: Won’t hurt but there are better ways to build muscle.

Trend: Scientifically tracking your blood sugar, even if you don’t have diabetes


Motivation is a tricky business for people looking to get leaner or eat healthier. The reward of fitting into a dress for a wedding that’s months away, or logging lower blood sugar at your next physical is uncertain and remote – but that rum cake will provide the jolt of satisfaction you crave right now. So could real-time data shift the calculus?

That’s the promise behind wearing a continuous glucose monitor, or CGM, a small device that sticks to the back of the arm. Every few minutes it sends a signal to your phone estimating the concentration of sugar in your blood. The tech has been a game-changer for some people with diabetes, providing a more user-friendly alternative to finger prick tests.

For people without diabetes, the theory is, a wearable glucose monitor can show you which snacks or meals make your blood sugar spike too high, and you can modify your diet accordingly.

According to the research, CGMs have helped some people lower their blood sugar or lose weight – others not so much.

There was a lot of personal variation in the results of two recent studies, says Collin Popp, a researcher at NYU Grossman School of Medicine who helped lead one of the studies. “We had individuals coming back and saying, ‘You changed my life. I lost 30 pounds and I feel great.’ Other people in the study put on weight,” he says.

If you try a CGM, you may want to take the data with a grain of salt. One recent study found that the same meal eaten on two different days gave very different readings. Another small study found that the continuous glucose monitor overestimated people’s blood sugar levels compared with measuring it in a blood test.

Bottom line: Continuous glucose monitors can be helpful, but take them with a grain of salt.

Trend: Drinking a bright blue dye


Here’s a weird one. Wellness influencers have been singing the praises of a synthetic dye that stains their tongues blue, and they claim it offers a host of benefits. Methylene blue dye is far from new. Formulated as a textile dye in the 19th century, it’s since been prescribed as a treatment for malaria, cyanide poisoning, and methemoglobinemia, a rare blood disorder.

Biohackers claim that methylene blue improves the function of the cells’ mitochondria, thereby slowing aging, improving mood and cognition, among other benefits.

Studies in rodents have shown methylene blue does improve mitochondrial function and reduce inflammation. But in preliminary human studies, the results haven’t shown significant benefit in healthy people, says Lorne Hofseth, a researcher at the University of South Carolina College of Pharmacy.

And there’s risks, including serotonin toxicity – a drug reaction that can cause elevated blood pressure, diarrhea, seizures, and even death. And like other supplements, methylene dye isn’t tested for safety before it goes to market. It can be hard to know what you’re really getting.

Bottom line: You’re probably turning your tongue blue for no reason.

Trend: More protein in everything … even your Oreos!


If you want protein on the go, you don’t have to look far. Grocery and convenience store shelves are lined with bars, cookies, brownies and other snack foods with “high protein” printed on the label.

But how do you suss out marketing from fact? It turns out there’s no particular metric manufacturers need to meet in order to advertise a product as “high protein.” For instance, a candy with 1 gram of protein may have a high-protein marketing claim on the front of the package, which admittedly is a lot more than most candy, says physiologist Stefan Pasiakos, but clearly doesn’t make it healthy.

One quick rule of thumb to assess protein claims is to check the percentage of the daily value of protein on the nutrition facts label on the package. Anything 20% or above can be seen as high protein, according to the FDA.

And even if they are high protein, packaged snacks can also be high in calories, sugar, or processed ingredients. You’ll do better to get protein from whole foods like yogurt or during meals, say nutritionists.

That being said, protein snacks can be a convenient way to reduce muscle soreness after a workout.

Bottom line: Junk food is still not a good choice, even with protein added

Trend: Beef fat is back, baby! For cooking (and skincare?!)


This March, Health Secretary Kennedy sat down at a fast food burger joint with Fox News host Sean Hannity, to talk about obesity and metabolic disease. The two were at a Steak N’ Shake in honor of the chain’s switch from vegetable oil to tallow, or rendered beef fat, to cook French fries.

Tallow was phased out of fast food chains decades ago, but Kennedy says it’s a healthier alternative to seed oils (aka vegetable oils), which he claimed in a post on X are “one of the driving forces of the obesity epidemic.”

So are fries cooked in beef tallow any healthier?

“People should eat fewer French fries, whatever they’re deep fried in,” says nutrition scientist Christopher Gardner. Beef tallow and other saturated fats can lead to clogged arteries and high blood pressure, he notes. And as a threat to health, seed oils have been unfairly villainized, says cardiologist. Dariush Mozaffarian, at Tufts University.

The real health villains in junk food are excessive amounts of refined grains, starches, and sugars, as well as salt and other preservatives, chemical additives, he says.

Meanwhile skincare products made from beef tallow are trending this year, too. It’s all part of a cultural moment where people are skeptical of synthetic ingredients, says Jennifer Reich, a sociologist at the University of Colorado Denver. As a sort of shortcut to healthier choices, Reich says people opt for things like beef tallow that seem natural because it ostensibly comes from a farm instead of an overseas factory supply chain. Yet for some users, they can make skin problems like acne worse.

Bottom line: Not so fast.

Trend: Creatine supplements are everything


Wellness influencer Bobby Parish declared creatine the “supplement of the year” for 2025 in a promotional TikTok post. It’s a compound made from three amino acids that your muscles use as a source of energy. Long a favorite of body-building gym bros, it’s another product that enthusiasts now credit with multiple benefits, including brain function and regulating blood sugar.

The evidence still isn’t strong for those two claims, but when it comes to adding lean muscle mass, the evidence for creatine supplements is “overwhelming,” says Jose Antonio, a professor of exercise and sports science at Nova Southeastern University in Florida. It can also help provide energy to keep at your workout longer.

But one big caveat here: Taking supplements isn’t enough to see strength gains – you actually have to get your butt to the gym and work out. A review of 35 studies found that when creatine supplements were combined with resistance training, adult men added around 2 to 3 pounds of lean body mass.


Contributor: Andrea Muraskin – NPR

Baker Beware: How I Was Fooled by and AI-Generated Recipe

Baker Beware: How I Was Fooled by and AI-Generated Recipe

Claremont Colonic Center
It started with the cutest little desserts: chocolate acorns with nut-covered caps that popped up in my search for Thanksgiving cookies on Pinterest, a site I visit for inspiration and some step-by-step instructions. There were also chocolate-dipped strawberries that you could turn into little turkeys using pretzel sticks, with marshmallow pieces for the drumsticks, but the acorns looked easier.
“Who wouldn’t love these things?” I thought.

The recipe said you could whip up a batch in 45 minutes. I splurged and bought my favorite Lindt chocolate bars to make them.

It ended at 1 a.m., after about five hours of effort – including an emergency run to the grocery store for a missing ingredient – with parchment-covered baking sheets spread across my kitchen, holding misshapen globs of chocolate-dunked peanut butter sandwich cookies that didn’t come close to resembling acorns. Despite my many attempts at adjusting the temperature of the chocolate and MacGyvering the cookies — I cut them, stacked them and stuck them together with chocolate — they just could not match the acorns in the photo.

I’m usually pretty good at these things (pie crust being a frustrating exception). I’m an experienced baker, and this should have been an easy project, more assembly than baking. I wasn’t going for gourmet; I needed a lot of treats for a church event and was short on time.

I finally had to admit that no matter how many times I reread the recipe and attempted to follow the instructions, it wasn’t going to work. I was stumped.

Then it dawned on me: Could this recipe have been generated by AI? Had I been had?

Even as I had been reading through the instructions, I kept wondering how the blogger got the Nutter Butter cookies — which are flat, with a peanut-like curved shape — to turn into the nice rounded shape of the acorns. The recipe recommends holding the cookies by the pointier end “to create the more natural looking” acorn.

OK, I thought. Maybe I need to just trust the process.

“They’re ridiculously cute, surprisingly simple, and honestly? They’ve become the most photographed dessert at every family gathering I bring them to,” gushed food blogger Anna Kelly, who described herself as a professionally trained pastry chef who runs the website DessertsPro.com. “My sister-in-law now requests them specifically, and I’ve made them at least twelve times since I first stumbled upon the idea three years ago.”

I fell for it. I bought three packages of the regular-size Nutter Butter cookies and searched several stores for the bite-size ones, which were supposed to be for the caps. Then I noticed a problem: The bite-size cookies were much smaller than the ends of the big Nutter Butters. It didn’t seem like they would work to make the overhanging acorn cap.

I still didn’t question the recipe. Instead, I thought I had bought the wrong size cookies. Was there a medium-size Nutter Butter? Oh, the recipe said Kelly sometimes uses Nilla wafers. That made more sense, but it was getting late, and I wasn’t going back to the grocery store.

Thankfully, the chocolate melted like it was supposed to, but it was pretty thin, and I was losing hope that it would coat the cookies thickly enough to look like the acorns in the photo. I tried popping it in the freezer to thicken it.

The website DessertsPro.com says Kelly created it to share her favorite tried-and-true recipes with home cooks. Her “About Us” page promises “clear, simple instructions,” easy-to-find ingredients, “honest tips and tricks” and “recipes that actually work.”

The problem is that neither Kelly nor her creations appears to be real.

‘Bad actors’

I attempted to reach the creators of the site through a “contact us” email as well as through the contact form but got no response by my deadline. I also attempted to contact Kelly through another food blog set up with her name and profile, MuffinIdeas.com. This site uses the same photo and syrupy text that talks about Kelly’s nostalgia for her grandmother’s baking, but the bio is slightly different: It says she’s not professionally trained but self-taught by reading countless baking books by the likes of celebrated chefs like Dorie Greenspan, the very real author of “Baking with Dorie,” and David Lebovitz, author of “Ready for Dessert.”

Emails sent to both websites were returned as undeliverable.

“This site is almost certainly AI,” said Adam Gallagher, who runs the food blog Inspired Taste, which he started with his wife, Joanne, in 2009.

The Gallaghers have been outspoken about the growing volume of AI-generated images and recipes meant to look like genuine food blogs that have permeated social media sites like Facebook and Pinterest.

They say that not only are these fake sites siphoning traffic that used to go to real bloggers, AI technology is scraping sites like theirs and emulating their style to create the computer-generated content it churns out.

It’s not that artificial intelligence, as a tool, is necessarily a bad thing, says Tom Critchlow, executive vice president for audience growth at Raptive, a company that helps bloggers and other creators monetize their content. It would be one thing, maybe, for a real chef or food blogger to use some AI to help refine their writing or get new ideas.

But that’s not what’s happening here, Critchlow says.

“These are bad actors generating hundreds of thousands of brand new, fresh domains that have never been seen before, using AI to generate hundreds and thousands of AI-generated recipes, images, et cetera, and covering the websites with ads,” he said.

“Pinterest has been overrun by these spammers,” Critchlow said. “Almost any kind of search term or any kind of exploration on Pinterest in the food and recipe space leads you to these websites, which are just spam top to bottom.”

Even sites with worthless content can make money when people click and scroll through them, just as I did when trying to figure out what I was doing wrong.

On average, content creators earn about $30 to $50 for every 1,000 page views to their sites, according to Raptive.

One food blogger might spend hours creating, testing and shooting a recipe to earn that rate, but AI-generated sites can earn the same money for content created in minutes.

“When you look at the scale and volume of these things, there are whole networks of sites, hundreds of sites, made by a single individual,” Critchlow said, noting that videos on YouTube also show how to do this.

Raptive says it kicks creators and websites out of its network if it discovers that they’re using AI tools to make spam recipes. This year alone, the company says, it’s blocked nearly 600 sites – of about 6,000 in its network – for AI-related issues.

The AI clues I missed

When I read back through my apparently fake recipe, I find clues I initially missed.

In the introduction, “Anna Kelly” writes that her nephew calls her Aunt Sarah, rather than Anna. The text says the site was created in 2019, but it – like MuffinIdeas.com – was copyrighted in 2025. Had I clicked around on some of the other recipes, I might have noticed that some of the photos were suspect: The blueberries in a loaf of sourdough bread are impossibly round purple craters, and the cupcakes or muffins (cuffins?) in Kelly’s profile pic have frosting that magically fades into the cake.

The recipe I attempted didn’t have any ratings or comments – another red flag, since I normally rely on the cooks who’ve gone before me for tips.

“People have a shiny look. It’s almost like everyone’s a little plasticky. That’s a telltale sign,” Gallagher said. “It’s like, everything’s in a little bit of Saran Wrap.”

I found the recipe on Pinterest, but the site links to accounts on Instagram, Facebook and X, though these profiles have little to no followers.

“Consumers are being duped by all the platforms,” Gallagher said.

He says platforms like Pinterest aren’t really motivated to filter out AI spam because they make money no matter where the recipe comes from, as long as it keeps people scrolling.

Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, didn’t respond to a request for comment by deadline. Pinterest did not offer a direct comment but said it disagrees with the idea that it isn’t motivated to help users who want to avoid AI-generated content. It says it will certainly hurt its business if people get frustrated by the content that’s on the site and stop coming.

It also says user feedback led the company to create an AI filter that users can turn on in their settings, which can help keep computer-generated content out of their feeds. It added the filter to the Food and Drinks category in mid-December. AI images are also supposed to be labeled when you enlarge them. The chocolate acorn photo I clicked on doesn’t have such a label, though.

Gallagher and Critchlow said they’ve tried the filter and didn’t notice a difference in their feeds. The company says the tool is new and should get better over time.

Pinterest also pointed me to an audit, performed by the digital security reporting site The Indicator, testing the promises of platforms to label AI-generated content, which was posted by the reporters. The audit found that five major platforms repeatedly failed to label AI-generated content on their sites, including content created using their own AI tools.

Pinterest was the most successful at labeling AI images, the audit found, but still had a success rate of 55%.

“I want to give Pinterest a little bit of credit, because they were early in introducing a way for users to filter AI content out of their feeds, which I think is something that all platforms should be doing,” said Alexios Mantzarlis, a former Google executive who is co-founder of the Indicator and did the AI testing for the story.

“So Pinterest, I think, is understanding from its users that the stuff sometimes is very annoying, and it appears to be reacting,” Mantzarlis said, though its tools aren’t great at flagging AI just yet. The company says it doesn’t want to ban AI completely because some people find that it inspires them.

The Gallaghers think there are more pragmatic reasons some social media sites haven’t been aggressive in tackling AI content.

The more content a platform has and the longer a user continues to scroll, the more ads it can show, Joanne Gallagher said.

Baking a fake

Spam sites aren’t the only way AI makes up recipes. Adam Gallagher points out that if you Google a particular thing you want to cook, the AI-generated summary that appears at the top of the page may be a complete recipe that was created with parts of recipes taken from the Inspired Taste blog and others that are smushed together and ultimately might not make anything worth eating.

“We call them Frankenstein recipes,” he said. Although the summaries link back to their sources, Gallagher said, few people click through to it, relying instead on the summary results.

Google says it cares deeply about the quality of the information on the internet and points to its policies that prohibit producing content at scale for the primary purpose of manipulating search rankings. Last year, the company says, it launched a policy against scaled content abuse that targets the creation of many low-value pages for the primary purpose of manipulating search and news rankings.

As for the AI summaries in its search, the company says users were looking for these kinds of tools, which are meant to highlight and help surface content rather than prevent traffic to it. “AI Overviews are often a helpful starting point to learn about a dish, but we see that people still want to go and read original recipes from creators. We’re focused on making it easy for people to discover and visit useful sites that have a good user experience.”

The Gallaghers said the AI spam, or slop, doesn’t hurt established sites like theirs as much because they have a loyal audience that comes to them directly for their recipes.

Instead, they worry about food bloggers who are just getting started, who depend on social media and search tools to generate traffic.

“Unfortunately, on all of these platforms, you have high-quality, trusted creators intermingled with all of this AI slop,” Adam Gallagher said.

When it’s hard to tell them apart, it erodes trust.

“When they keep chiseling away that trust, then you’re going to trust us less too, because you’re not going to find us,” Joanne Gallagher said. “You’re not going to be using Pinterest or Facebook or Instagram or whatever to actually find recipes anymore.”

As for me, even though I live and work online and Googling has become my default way to find just about everything, I find myself coming out of this episode with a new appreciation for my cookbooks.

Who knows, maybe AI will end up boosting book sales, which wouldn’t be such a bad thing.


Contributor: Brenda Goodman – CNN Health

Banish Your Sinus Infection with This Easy Home Remedy

Banish Your Sinus Infection with This Easy Home Remedy

Claremont Colonic Center
I have experienced a sinus infection on several occasions. It is one of the most uncomfortable and miserable conditions to get, especially during the busy holiday season. The pressure is almost always accompanied with a bad headache and even a fever. >
When the inflammation of the mucous membranes become infected, the discomfort is almost unbearable at times. When you have a sinus infection, trying to sleep becomes very difficult due to blocked airways. This causes so much dull pain and tension between the eyes. No thank you!

Having this all-natural sinus mix at the ready gives me peace of mind. I know that when I feel the onset of a sinus infection, I can start applying this infection fighter. I quickly feel the relief and pressure start subsiding. Since it is all natural, I can use it as often as I need it. I hope you love it as much as I do.

Ingredients

5 drops peppermint essential oil

5 drops eucalyptus essential oil

5 drops rosemary essential oil

5 drops geranium essential oil

Almond oil or any other carrier oil of your choice

Equipment

1 10-ml glass roller bottle (Amazon.com carries them)

Instructions
1. Gather your ingredients and the glass roller bottle.

2. Remove the roller from the bottle. Now add the essential oils.

3. Fill the rest of the bottle with almond oil or the carrier oil of your choice.

4. Replace the roller. Make sure to shake really well before each use.

Roll the mix over your sinuses, forehead and under your eyes. Be careful not to get any in your eyes. If you do, just add a little almond oil (or any other oil) and it will dilute the essential oils. If you use water, it will make it worse because water and essential oils do not mix.

Use this roller blend as often as you need in order to get some relief from the pressure of the sinus infection.


Contributor: Leilani Hampton – Alternative Daily