5 Essential Food Items to Store for Emergency

5 Essential Food Items to Store for Emergency

Claremont Colonic Center Newsletter
You don’t have to be “serious prepper” to value the art of planning ahead. Whether you are planning for an economic crash, a foreign invasion, a civil uprising or a really tough winter storm, planning is good. Part of planning involves thinking about how you are going to feed yourself and your family if food becomes scarce or you can’t leave your home.
Although we live in a land of plenty – the reality is, something could happen and we need to be prepared. If planning is something new to you, start with a 3-day supply of food. You can grow your supply a little each month if you desire more security. Designating a small space in your home such as a closet, for storing some food is a good idea no matter how invisible you may feel. Here are five food items that we uncovered that will keep for a very, very long time.

Raw Honey

Honey will not go bad. It has been found in a tomb in Egypt and estimated to have been there for 3000 years and was still edible. Color and consistency may change with temperature changes but the value of the honey remains the same. Honey is not just for eating. It has been used for centuries to treat countless ailments. Hippocrates himself wrote of the “liquid gold” and its medicinal effects.

Raw Nuts and Seeds

Nuts and seeds can last indefinitely when packaged. Find your favorites and keep an ample supply of each on hand. Nuts and seeds offer an excellent source of vitamins, minerals, protein and fiber and provide a valuable source of energy.

Nuts are a nutritious part of any snack or meal. They are high in protein, and high in heart-healthy fats and fiber. In addition, raw nuts have essential nutrients such as B vitamins, vitamin E, potassium, magnesium, iron and zinc, sterols and antioxidants.

There are many kinds of nuts and each has its own health-promoting properties. For instance, Brazil nuts provide high quantities of selenium and almonds are an excellent source of calcium. Walnuts are a super rich source of omega-3 fatty acids. Studies show that just one small handful of nuts provides protection against heart disease that is similar to cholesterol-lowering drugs.

Hemp seeds are considered a superfood as a nutritional powerhouse. They’re balanced perfectly with a 3-to-1 oil ratio of omega-6 and omega-3 and are also a good source of stearidonic acid and gamma linoleic acid. Pumpkin seeds are high in carotenoids, an antioxidant that boosts immune activity and increases the body’s ability to fight disease.

They’re high in omega-3s and contain zinc which helps to battle inflammation. Pumpkin seeds even contain a high level of phytosterols which serve to stabilize cholesterol levels and offer an enhanced immune response.

Whole Food or Raw Protein Bars

While we don’t recommend packaged food for the most part, high quality raw or whole food protein bars are easy to store and provide a good source of protein, carbohydrates and healthy fat.

Most are packed with organic whole foods including nuts, sprouts, fruits and vegetables and also may contain live probiotics and a good source of fiber. Look for bars that are non-GMO and contain no fillers, colorings or artificial ingredients.

Organic Jerky

Packaged organic jerky such as bison, salmon or grass fed beef or turkey will keep for a very long time. Buy from a reputable dealer or make your own. Jerky is dried, removing most of the moisture where bacteria likes to grow and also includes some salt which adds more preservation.

The high protein content and its longevity make it a popular choice amongst survivalists. The best way to store jerky is in its original vacuum sealed packaging in a cool and dark place. You can also freeze for longer shelf life.

Beans

Beans are a perfect addition to your food storage pantry. They are high in protein and fiber, and if sealed in a food-grade bucket along with a little dried ice they will keep for up to ten years. Another great thing about beans is that they are fairly inexpensive. Buy a few bags of red, black, pinto, lentils, etc. when you go to the store and stock up when they are on sale.

Other Emergency Foods to Consider

Here are a few more food ideas to add to your emergency food stash.

  • Sea salt
  • Coconut crystals
  • Coconut water
  • Filtered water
  • Coconut oil
  • Organic chicken broth (keep in freezer)
  • Dried figs or dates
  • Nut butters



Contributor: The Alternative Daily

FDA OKs New Self-Test for HPV, What to Know

FDA OKs New Self-Test for HPV, What to Know

CCC Newsletter
  • The FDA has approved two new self-screening tests for HPV.
  • Patients would be able to access the self-screening test at a physician’s office.
  • While these tests can act as a supplement, the pelvic exam may still be necessary in some cases.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved two new self-tests to detect HPV. These new tests would allow people to take their own sample to test for HPV, instead of having a physician perform a pelvic exam to take a sample.

Detecting HPV can help physicians determine if a person is at risk for cervical cancer.

The tests are made by Roche and BD.

A better way to test for HPV?

HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection, with more than 42 million cases in the U.S., according to the CDC.

“The introduction of self-screening tests for cervical cancer is a fascinating development,” said Matthew Casavant, MD, OB/GYN and founder of South Lake Obstetrics & Gynecology. “These tests can potentially increase screening rates by reducing the discomfort and anxiety associated with pelvic exams.”

The HPV test can detect signs of the virus in the cervix. These viruses can be precursors to cervical cancer.

To test for HPV, a physician would traditionally take a swab while doing a pelvic exam of a patient. That swab would then be tested for HPV.

With these new tests, patients themselves can use the swab to take a sample. The sample is taken at the physician’s office, similar to how a urine sample might be taken at a medical office. However, the FDA may soon allow these tests to be conducted at home, according to the Washington Post.

Dr. June Hou is an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, and also a specialist in treating gynecologic cancers, said that these types of tests may help remove barriers for women to get HPV testing especially if they are approved for at-home use.

“I am excited about these new tests overall,” Hou said. “Cervical cancer is one of the few preventable cancers by ways of vaccination and screening. To receive screening however, women currently will need to carve time out of their day to make an appointment…These new tests will remove some of these barriers that are time consuming,and will broaden access to cervical cancer screening to more women, in a more convenient way.”

Reasons pelvic exams may still be necessary

However, while these new tests may serve as a supplementary tool, they should not completely replace pelvic exams, Casavant noted. Pelvic exams are crucial for detecting other gynecological issues beyond cervical cancer, such as ovarian cysts, endometriosis, and sexually transmitted infections.

Signs of cervical cancer

Symptoms include:
  • irregular bleeding
  • unusual vaginal discharge
  • pelvic pain
  • pain during intercourse

“These symptoms often appear in advanced stages, which is why regular screening through Pap smears and HPV tests are critical for early detection,” Casavant stated.

How to reduce your risk of developing cervical cancer

When it comes to preventing cervical cancer, there are several approaches that can be effective. Being proactive is essential, say medical experts.

“Preventing cervical cancer primarily involves regular screening, getting the HPV vaccine, and practicing safe sex to reduce HPV transmission,” said Casavant.

“Treating cervical cancer might include surgical interventions, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, depending on the stage at diagnosis. Staying informed about your health, attending regular check-ups, and discussing any concerns with your doctor are the best proactive measures.”

Hou said that the most effective way to prevent cervical cancer is still getting vaccinated against HPV.

“HPV vaccines are extremely effective at preventing HPV infection, the precursor to the vast majority of cervical cancer,” Hou said. “While vaccination is typically recommended before age 12, it is also recommended for everyone up to age 26 if they were not already vaccinated. Additionally, cervical cancer screening is very effective at diagnosing pre-cancer cells of the cervix. Removing the pre-cancer cells will prevent cancer.”

The CDC notes people aged 27 to 45 may also get the HPV vaccine if they were not adequately vaccinated when they were younger.

Takeaway

The FDA has approved two new tests that allow women to perform a self-test to detect signs of HPV. These new tests may help cut out some uncomfortable pelvic exams at the gynecologist.


Contributor: Kaitlin Vogel, Jennifer Chesak –Healthline.com

Women Are Less Likely to Die When Treated by Female Doctors, Study Suggest

Women Are Less Likely to Die When Treated by Female Doctors, Study Suggest

Claremont Colonic Newsletter
The study adds to a growing body of research that explores why women and minorities tend to receive worse medical care than men and white patients.
Hospitalized women are less likely to die or be readmitted to the hospital if they are treated by female doctors, a study published Monday in the Annals of Internal Medicine found.

In the study of people ages 65 and older, 8.15% of women treated by female physicians died within 30 days, compared with 8.38% of women treated by male physicians.

Although the difference between the two groups seems small, the researchers say erasing the gap could save 5,000 women’s lives each year.

The study included nearly 800,000 male and female patients hospitalized from 2016 through 2019. All patients were covered by Medicare. For male hospitalized patients, the gender of the doctor didn’t appear to have an effect on risk of death or hospital readmission.

The data alone doesn’t explain why women fare better when treated by other women. But other studies suggest that women are less likely to experience “miscommunication, misunderstanding and bias” when treated by female doctors, said lead study author Dr. Atsushi Miyawaki, a senior assistant professor of health services research at the University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine.

The new research is part of a growing field of study examining why women and minorities tend to receive worse medical care than men and white patients. For example, women and minority patients are up to 30% more likely to be misdiagnosed than white men.

“Our pain and our symptoms are often dismissed,” said Dr. Megan Ranney, dean of the Yale School of Public Health. “It may be that women physicians are more aware of that and are more empathetic.”

Research shows that women are less likely than men to receive intensive care but more likely to report having negative experiences with health care, having their concerns dismissed, and having their heart or pain symptoms ignored, the authors wrote in the new study. Male physicians are also more likely than female doctors to underestimate women’s risk of stroke.

Part of the problem, Miyawaki said, is that medical students get “limited training in women’s health issues.”

Dr. Ronald Wyatt, who is Black, said his 27-year-old daughter recently had trouble getting an accurate diagnosis for her shortness of breath. An emergency room physician told her the problem was caused by asthma. It took two more trips to the emergency room for his daughter to learn that she actually had a blood clot in her lungs, a potentially life-threatening situation.

“There is a tendency for doctors to harbor sexist stereotypes about women, regardless of age, such as the notion that women’s symptoms are more emotional or their pain is less severe or more psychological in origin,” said Wyatt, former chief science and chief medical officer at the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine, a nonprofit research and advocacy group.

Women seem to experience fewer of these problems when treated by other women.

For example, a study published JAMA Surgery in 2021 found that women patients developed fewer complications if their surgeon was female. Another JAMA Surgery study published in 2023 found all patients had fewer complications and shorter hospital stays if they were operated on by female surgeons, who worked more slowly than their male counterparts.

Women primary care doctors also tend to spend more time with their patients, Ranney said. Although that extra attention is great for patients, it also means that women see fewer patients per day and earn less, on average, than male doctors.

Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of the Brown University School of Public Health, said several studies suggest that female doctors follow medical evidence and guidelines, and that their patients have better outcomes.

“There’s lots of variation between women and men physicians,” said Jha, who was not involved in the new study. Women “tend to be better at communication, listening to patients, speaking openly. Patients report that communication is better. You put these things together, and you can understand why there are small but important differences.”

The authors of the study said it’s also possible that women are more forthcoming about sensitive issues with female physicians, allowing them to make more informed diagnoses.

That doesn’t mean that women should switch doctors, said Dr. Preeti Malani, a professor of medicine at the University of Michigan. For an individual patient, the differences in mortality and readmission rates seen in the new study are tiny.

“It would be a mistake to suggest that people need to find physicians of the same gender or race as themselves,” Jha said. “The bigger issue is that we need to understand why these differences exist.”

Malani said she’s curious about what women doctors are doing to prevent patients from needing to be readmitted soon after discharge. “How much care and thought is going into that discharge plan?” Malani asked. “Is that where women are succeeding? What can we learn about cultural humility and asking the right questions?”

Others aren’t convinced that the new study proves a physician’s gender makes a big difference.

Few hospitalized patients are treated by a single doctor, said Dr. Hardeep Singh, a professor at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston and a patient safety researcher at the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center.

Hospital patients are treated by teams of physicians, especially if they need specialist care, in addition to nurses and other professionals, Singh said.

“How often do you see the same doc every day in the hospital?” Singh asked. “The point is that it’s not a one-man or one-woman show. Outcomes are unlikely to depend on one individual, but rather on a clinical team and the local context of care. … One name may appear on your bill, but the care is team-based.”

However, Singh said his research on misdiagnoses shows that doctors in general need to do a better job listening to patients. Jha said he’d like the health system to learn what women doctors are doing right when they treat other women, then teach all physicians to practice that way.

“We should train everyone to be better at generating trust and being worthy of trust,” Jha said.

Wyatt said the country needs to take several steps to better care for women patients, including “de-biasing training” to teach doctors to overcome stereotypes. The health care system also needs to increase the number of women physicians in leadership, recruit more female doctors and do a better job at retaining them. All physicians also need more understanding of how adverse childhood experiences affect patient health, particularly for women, he said.

“More than once I’ve had white female patients tell me they came to be because I listened and they trusted me,” Wyatt said .


Contributor: Liz Szabo – NBC News

More Than 16.000 Pounds of Ground Beef Sold At Walmart Recalled Over E.coli Risk

More Than 16.000 Pounds of Ground Beef Sold At Walmart Recalled Over E.coli Risk

Claremont Colonic Newsletter
Over 16,000 pounds of ground beef produced by Cargill Meat Solutions and sold at Walmart have been recalled due to concerns of a possible E. coli contamination.
The contaminated beef was produced on April 26 and April 27 and distributed to Walmart stores throughout the eastern U.S., according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

So far, there have been no confirmed reports of illness linked to the beef products, USDA said. Cargill said it launched a voluntary recall out “of an abundance of caution.”

The Pennsylvania-based food distributor became concerned of a possible contamination after discovering that “previously segregated product had been inadvertently utilized in the production of ground beef,” the agency said.

The ground beef has been sold at Walmart locations in Connecticut, Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, Maryland, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Virginia, West Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Vermont and New York.

The Cargill products subject to recall include:

  • 2.25-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing “93% lean 7% fat all natural lean ground beef”
  • 1.33-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing four “prime rib steak burgers patties”
  • 2.25-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing “85% lean 15% fat all natural angus premium ground beef”
  • 2.25-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing “80% lean 20% fat all natural ground beef chuck”
  • 1.33-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing four “80% lean 20% fat all natural ground beef chuck patties”
  • 1.33-lbs. plastic-wrapped trays containing four “90% lean 10% fat all natural ground beef sirloin patties”


USDA advises consumers to throw away or return the contaminated products to the place of purchase.


Contributor: NPR